
![]() John Singleton Copley was a Boston-born American artist of the colonial period, famous for his portraits of important figures in colonial New England, particularly men and women of the middle class. His portraits were innovative in that they tended to portray their subjects with artifacts that were indicative of their lives. Copley was virtually self-taught as a portraitist. By meticulously recording details, he created powerful characterizations of his Boston sitters. After he emigrated to London in 1774, Copley began to specialize in narrative scenes from history and joined the influential artistic institution, the Royal Academy of Art. Copley demonstrated a genius, in both his American and British periods, for rendering surface textures and capturing emotional immediacy. Copley's mother owned a tobacco shop on Long Wharf. The parents, who according to the artist's granddaughter, Martha Babcock Amory, came to Boston in 1736, were "engaged in trade, like almost all the inhabitants of the North American colonies at that time". Born in Boston in 1738, Copley was influenced by the mezzotints of his stepfather, Peter Pelham, and the portraits of local portrait painter John Smibert. Copley painted both the young and the aged but emphasized setting to convey the desired mood. Ladies posed before fine furniture and textured draperies; men were surrounded by books and tools, hunting dogs and guns. His style was straightforward and realistic, creating portraits of great strength. Among his many 'subjects' were portraits of John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams and countless lords and ladies of his era, both in America and in London. |
||
|
|
Besides painting portraits in oil, doubtless after a formula learned from Peter Pelham, Copley was an American pioneer using pastels. John Singleton Copley wrote, on September 30, 1762, to the Swiss painter Jean-Étienne Liotard, asking him for "a set of the best Swiss Crayons for drawing of Portraits." The young American anticipated Liotard's surprise "that so remote a corner of the Globe as New England should have any demand for the necessary supplies for practicing the fine Arts" by assuring him that "America which has been the seat of war and desolation, I would fain hope will one Day become the School of fine Arts". The requested pastels were duly received and used by Copley in making many portraits in a medium suited to his talent. By this time Copley had begun to demonstrate his genius for rendering surface textures and capturing emotional immediacy. |
![]() |
![]() |
Although John Singleton Copley was steadily employed with commissions from the
Boston bourgeoisie, he wanted to test himself against the more exacting
standards of Europe. In 1766 Copley exhibited "Boy with a Squirrel"
(shown here) at the
Society of Artists in London. It was highly praised both by Sir Joshua
Reynolds and by Copley's countryman Benjamin
West. Copley married in 1769. Although he did not venture out of Boston
except for a seven-month stay in New York City in 1771, he was
urged by fellow artists who were familiar with his work to study in Europe.
Copley's father-in-law was the merchant to whom the tea that provoked the Boston Tea Party was consigned. When political and economic conditions in Boston began to deteriorate, ( Copley left the country in June of 1774, never to return. In 1775 John Singleton's wife, children, and several other family members arrived in London, and Copley established a home there in 1776. Copley's ambitions in Europe went beyond portraiture and he was eager to make a success in the more highly regarded sphere of historical painting. In his first important work, "Watson and the Shark", Copley used what was to become one of the great themes of 19th-century Romantic art, the struggle of man against nature. John Singleton Copley was elected to the Royal Academy in 1779. Although Copley's English paintings grew more academically sophisticated and self-conscious, in general they lacked the extraordinary vitality and penetrating realism of his Boston portraits. Toward the end of his life, his physical and mental health grew worse. Though he continued to paint with considerable success until the last few months of his life, he was obsessed by the sale (at a loss) of his Boston property and by his increasing debts. |
![]() |
Simply Art Homepage Art Styles and Fundamentals Index Artist Encyclopedia Rock Through the Pages